For various reasons, we’ve been discussing the “time traveller” John Titor around the house over the last couple of days and the posts he made at the end of 2000 make interesting reading and particularly the responses that those replying made to various comments that he made back then.
If you’ve not come across him before, have a read of the summary here or perhaps the analysis here.
One thing to note is that, whether or not he was a genuine time-traveller, it seemed to be impossible to prove one way or the other at the time. After all, you can’t really expect a real-life time traveller to know the result of the lottery next week, can you? Neither can you realistically expect them to have intimate knowledge of small events such as happen day to day but whilst you could expect them to know about significant events. However, aside from World War 3 breaking out next Tuesday you can’t really rely on what’s significant for us now to be equally significant for them in, say, 100 years and vice versa.
For example, if our time traveller were to go back to 1908 who would believe him when he said a civil servant would make the first theoretical breakthrough that proved that time travel was possible? And, yet, that’s exactly what Albert Einstein went on to do.
Likewise, whilst we consider 9/11 very significant, who can say if that will still be the case 100 years from now?
Even inconsistencies in the John Titor dialogues mean little. For example, say you went back to 1938. You could say that people still sat around the modern radio (ie TV) listening to it as people did in 1938 but equally you could also say that people didn’t listen to the radio much anymore. Seemingly inconsistent in 1938 terms but entirely consistent from our viewpoint in 2008.
Finally, there’s the problem that a time traveller could affect future events. What if you went back to 1999 and started talking about the events of 9/11? Would the events of 9/11 still happen? Certainly if the authorities believed the predictions, but perhaps also if those predictions were widely enough distributed and nobody fully believed them it might be enough to simply suspect that they could be true.
Copyright © 2007-2008 by A Time of Magic. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2008 by A Time of Magic. All rights reserved.